Friday, October 7, 2011

Shop floor insights – winners and losers

One of the pillars of TOC is the "win-win" concept, which states that for every conflict a solution in which nobody loses is feasible (Please see the comment I got on this from Avraham Mordoch below). This stems from the very basic assumption or axiom that win-lose situations can't exist in real life. Compromises can exist only when the compromise is acceptable for the compromiser and in most cases both sides need to compromise to make the situation acceptable. When a compromise can't be achieved there are only two options: either everybody wins or everybody loses. No other option exists.
This axiom should be taken into consideration when creating any kind of incentive pay scheme. If your scheme is based on "one man's gain is another man's pain" you are setting yourself up for disharmony and loss.
So what happens when people get paid a commission based on their sales? As far as I could see we got less service to customers as it is considered bad manners to step into another worker's sale and we got quarrels when such step in accidentally happened. Sometimes even heated quarrels. Between people who have to work together day in and day out. When I asked about this I was told that when we compete against each other (the data was easily reviewed at all times) we become more motivated. If we see the other sales clerk has more sales, we'll push harder, if we see the other store has more sales – we'll push harder. But, as far as my logic goes – people buy what they want. Sales clerks have an impact, sure, but it is limited. If someone has lit a fire under me, the natural reaction will either be to push hard, which will turn off the buyers, or clam up, which will reduce service to the buyers.
I have to say that I find I get the best service at restaurants that use a tipping pool – all tips go into the pool and are then split between the entire shift staff. This means all the service staff has a vested interest in my pleasure and cooperation is beneficial for all. I am sure that the team members know who is free riding on them and quickly straighten such abusers. When tips are personal, service can still be great, but it is at risk.
My suggestion to that retail chain - pay comission based on store performance, then you'll have a team working together.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Orion, in the beginning of the article you mentioned the "win-win" concept and you said that "for every conflict a solution in which nobody loses is feasible". I don't agree. Your statement is correct only when it is possible to define a common objective for the two sides of the conflict. This is not always the case. There are conflicts with no common objective and then it is impossible to have the desired win-win solution.
Regards,
Avraham Mordoch

Unknown said...

Avraham,
Thanks for the clarification. I stand corrected.
One thing does come to my mind, though - do you think that in such situations (no common goal) there is an option for a win-lose solution?
Regards
Orion

Henry Fitzhugh Camp said...

Hi Orion,
I like your post. It supports what I see and this excellent presentation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

Win-Lose can work for the winner, for a while, even when the two sides have the same goal. The problem with Win-Lose is that, after a time, the loser no longer agrees with the winner's goal. That's how the winner ends up losing.
-Henry Camp

Unknown said...

Henry,
Thanks!
The thing that strikes me the most about win-lose is that it doesn't even work when there is no common goal. The way I see it, in real life no one likes to lose, so no one really feels like "showing good sportmanship". Oh, we may be gracefull losers when a game is being played, but in real life losing is usually a tough blow. Revenge is easy and it is tempting. At the least, we can make sure we are not alone at our loss. I guess we all know these scenarios.....

Anonymous said...

Hi Orion,
I don't think that win-lose is an option, definitely not for the long term. It may be good for a while, if one is on the right side :-), but surely enough things will be changed. It looks as the situation between the Israelis and the Palestinian is a perfect example (without getting into politics). No common goal and until such a goal will be defined (if one has enough patience) both sides are losing.
Avraham